Thursday, February 27, 2014

How "Strongly"?

"Strongly" enough to lower the grade you'll give to any Senator who votes to confirm him? [More]

Why don't you say that?

We're the Only Ones Masterful Enough

I'm the master. [Watch]
And if you don't obey gun surrender orders, you're anti-American.

California DOJ asked how ‘smart gun’ without microstamping made ‘safe’ roster

The inclusion of the Armatix handgun on the roster “means that it ‘should’ have microstamping, but it doesn't to my knowledge have that feature,” the industry source explained. “So the question that needs to be asked is how did the gun get on the roster on October 24th of 2013? Could it be because it somehow follows the narrative that the AG's office is pushing?” [More]
Today’s Gun Rights Examiner report asks a couple simple questions that ought to have simple answers. You’d think.

We Have Some Good News and Some Bad News...

...from Oregon... [More]

The Prosecution Rests

But how he can sleep is another matter. [More]

[Via LS]

We Must Keep Guns Away from Children...

...so they can be ripped apart and eaten alive by wild animals!  [More]

[Insert name of anti-gunner here] would have preferred it if these children had been horribly and painfully killed instead of armed. That's why Prozis who refer to them as "our kids," that is, resources of the collective, insist on keeping them ignorant about guns and then, in another "Opposite Day" manifestation, referring to that as "common sense gun safety."

Besides, what's that other Prozi slogan?
A rat is a pig is a dog is a boy...

Besides, that cougar had just as much right to live as these species-privileged animal murderers.

Just look at some of the comments essentially in agreement with that.

[Via Florida Guy]

Checkpoint Charlie

[More]

And remember: They hate us because we're free!

Onward Christian Soldiers

Praise the Lord and pass the ammunition. [More]

[Via Michael G]

A Liberal Gun Policy

Do it for the children. [Watch]

[Via TF]

Oh What a Tangled Deep Dark Web We Weave...

While this sounds inherently illegal, it really isn’t; Allison Price, a spokesperson for the U.S. Justice Department, clarified to the Daily Beast: “There is no federal law prohibiting sales of firearms over the Internet, and the ready availability of firearms through social applications presents yet another avenue for unlicensed sellers to transfer guns anonymously and without background checks. [More]
Really? This is an even bigger threat than Deep Classified Ads?

So how come "The Armory" has to mill out power tools to smuggle shipments?

The "sales" described in this bullshit hit piece engineered to gin up hysteria against private sales  absolutely are "inherently illegal."  The Armory sounds more like a government-run undercover operation, and one intended to spread more disinformation than guns.

Funny, how everybody involved with this neglected to mention what the government knows damn well from their own report, that as far as "universal background checks" are concerned, "Effectiveness depends on the ability to reduce straw purchasing, requiring gun registration..."

Gee, guys--agenda much...?

We're the Only Ones Losing Enough

One more reason why THEY ought to be required to use "smart guns"... [More]

Right, cop unions?

Calling a National Socialist a National Socialist

They don't like it. [More]

That's why we have the term "inconvenient truth."

Damn Prozis.

[Via JM]

Not Gun Rights Related, But...

The hearing has received almost NO press coverage to date. [More
So somebody's gotta do the job the media won't do.

[Via James Simpson]

We're the Only Ones Poaching Enough

Well hell, he oughtta fit right in... [More]

[Via Florida Guy]

We're the Only Ones Appropriate and Reasonable Enough

You thugs keep telling yourselves that. [More]

And by all means delude yourselves into thinking people buy it.

[Via Florida Guy]

Strangely Similar...

...yet tellingly different... [More]

[Via bondmen]

We're the Only Ones More Concerned Enough

"Every time our officer stops someone, there is concern someone has a gun. Now we have to be more concerned about who has a gun," he said. [More]
Hey, if you can't do the job, quit, whiner.

In re the Timmons quote stirring up so much outrage, as big of an authoritarian mudhead as the guy obviously is, in the video he said "automobile is not part of your home," not "your automobile is not your property," as the "real reporter" wrote.  I believe the simplest explanation is carelessness/laziness on the part of the "Authorized Journalist."

UPDATE:  This version has the written quote matching a more complete video quote:
"I don't think this has anything to do with the second amendment rights when you have the right to carry a weapon off your property," said Executive Director of the Alabama Sheriffs' Association, Bobby Timmons.  "An automobile is not a part of your home. It's a part of the public property."
Funny thing about the ASA--guess what they prominently display on their website?


Why did the alarm on my Weaselword Detector just go off?



[Via Scott J]

We're the Only Ones Impounding Enough

"Ordinary citizens, again and again, told us they didn't trust the police"... [More]
Excellent!

Keep squeezing, fellas.

Until our eyeballs bleed.

[Via David B]

The Undiscovered Country

This is deadly serious stuff, this foray into an undiscovered country that you have so blithely entered upon, like blind men and women tap dancing in a minefield you scarcely comprehend. [More]
Vanderboegh writes an "Open Letter to the Legislative Tyrants of Connecticut."

How to Spread a Lie and Subvert Freedom in Three Easy Steps

Step One: Anti-gun "researchers" publish an agenda-supporting "study" concluding access to firearms puts women at higher risks for homicide than men.

Step Two: "Authorized Journalists" pick up on it and conflate "access" with "ownership."

Step Three: Evangelize the gospel throughout the land.

By lumping peaceable and responsible people who control themselves in with those who are violent and irresponsible, the "average" is inflated, caused almost entirely by the latter group.

That's then used to con the public into supporting the disarming of those not hurting anyone via edicts that will not affect those responsible for the abuse.

Oh, and Scott Martelle...? It's not a hobby, you idiot.

This Day in History: February 27

[More]